No. Break tests are leadership tests but are not one of the defined psychology tests per the Psychology section of the Rulebook. Therefore, units with the ability to re-roll failed psychology tests may not re-roll failed break tests and items which allow the re-roll of failed break tests do not allow the re-roll of failed psychology tests.

No. Rally tests are leadership tests but are not one of the defined psychology tests per the Psychology section of the Rulebook. Units with the ability to re-roll failed psychology tests therefore may not re-roll a failed rally test.

The tests should be taken in the same order as they are listed in the Psychology section of the Rulebook.

The character's psychology takes precedence. So, if the character is Immune to Psychology, the entire model is Immune to Psychology. Also, if a character rider is frenzied, then it must always charge (using the movement of the monster). However, there are some exceptions to this. These exceptions are: Fear, Terror, Stupidity and Frenzy. A Fear or Terror causing monster (or chariot) passes on immunity to fear/terror to its rider. If the monster (or chariot) suffers from Stupidity, or is subject to Frenzy, then these are out of the control of the rider, and the entire model may suffer from it. In all other cases, the entire model uses the character rider's psychology. Further Direwolf FAQ Council clarification: In these cases where the mount's Stupidity or Frenzy affects the rider, it is the movement effects, not the close combat effects.

That would come under "voluntary tests". By the strict letter of the rules, only casualties in the enemy magic and shooting phases apply. However, as well known, friendly fire isn't friendly at all, and I would probably take a panic test if one of my units suffered self-inflicted casualties in this way.

No test required. The panic test for friends destroyed is very specific about enemy magic and shooting again. In this case, most soldiers are just waiting for the wizard's head to explode or the whirly-gun of doom to blow itself up. They're pretty used to this type of behaviour.

No.

No. Even single models with less than five wounds on their original profile that break in combat force nearby friendly units to take panic tests.

In the Warhammer Chronicles Errata section, the wording on page 81 of the Rulebook was changed to exclude single models with less than 5 wounds on their original profile from causing Panic tests when destroyed by missile fire or magic. Such models also do not cause panic tests if they are destroyed in close combat. Note however that such models DO cause panic tests in friendly units within 6" if they break from close combat and if they are fleeing and have higher unit strength than friendly units within 4" at the start of a turn.

This is determined at the start of each phase if it's a single model at that point, then its destruction won't cause panic.

Delete the last sentence. Unit Strength 5 is the only requirement needed to determine whether a test is required.

No. Panic does not cascade. If, in the player's subsequent turn, the unit that panicked is still fleeing and is close enough to friendly units to force them to take a panic check, one must be taken. None of the listed cases for taking a panic test is based on another friendly unit failing a panic test.

Use the following procedure: The fear-causing unit declares a charge. The charged unit says 'I'd like to stand and shoot.' Check to see if the charging unit is in range. If it is then the defenders must take a Fear test. If they fail their test and are outnumbered, they will flee as normal, replacing their stand & shoot charge reaction. If for any reason they do not flee, then the charged unit may stand & shoot as normal.

If a single model (e.g. a character) that causes fear is in a unit that doesn't cause fear then any tests or effects that the fear causes is only applied to that character, not the entire unit he is with. For example, a unit would have to take a fear test if a unit with a single fear causing model in it charges them. However if that test is failed then the unit only flees if the fear causing character by itself has a higher Unit Strength than the unit being charged. If the test is failed and the unit requires 6's to hit, then it is only 6's to hit the single fear causing model, not the rest of the unit he is with. In an instance where a unit declares a charge against an enemy unit with a single fear causing model and the unit declaring the charge will come into contact with the single fear causing model, then the unit declaring the charge must also take a fear test and, if the fear test is failed, the unit will not charge.

Neither. If a unit is outnumbered by fear-causing enemies, then it automatically breaks. Operative word is unit, not side, so it is worked out on its Unit Strength versus total Unit Strength of fear- causing enemies it is actually fighting (i.e. in base to base contact with), in the same way that break test are rolled for individually rather than per side.

The way I would see it most easily solved is to say that the example quoted on page 82 refers only to mixed units including some models in the unit causing fear, others not - and that it does not refer to characters at all. This would mean a fear causing character does not make a unit immune to fear - and it does say on page 100: "if a unit of troops panics, or is forced to flee because of a Fear of Terror test, then any character who is part of the unit must also flee even if he is immune to panic, fear, or terror."

Change 'higher' to 'equal to or higher' in the section on being charged by a fear-causing enemy

Test once per unit, as each is found to be in range.

If, for some reason, a character does not pass their Ld on to a unit they have joined, then they may make separate Ld tests. Note that in most circumstances this would not make a difference if the unit flees (from terror or panic, for example), the character has to flee with them. regardless of its own Ld value.

Yes, each unit is only forced to take one Terror test per BATTLE. After taking the first Terror test, units treat Terror causing units as causing Fear.

No. Just a Terror test.

It counts as having fled the table, and thus the enemy gets the victory points.

No.

The entire unit stumbles forward at half the character's movement value or the unit's base movement value, whichever is lower.

The frenzied unit must complete its charge, even if this takes it through a Fanatic.

Follow this sequence: 1) Declare normal charges; 2) Measure to see if frenzied units must charge, declare charges for those that have to; 3) Move chargers; 4) Move frenzied chargers.

Yes, forced frenzied charges are treated as normal charges in regards to charge reactions. See the Q&A above for the proper sequence of executing frenzied charges.

First, Frenzied units that lose combat always take break tests, just like any other unit. Second, the break test isn't to see if you are defeated. If you have to take a break test you are already defeated, that's what losing the combat resolution means. So regardless of the outcome of a break test, a frenzied unit has already lost its frenzy, just by having to take one. An outnumbering fear causing enemy will therefore normally break a formerly frenzied unit, as the state of frenzy is lost prior to having to take a break test.

No, only unit C counts as in "first round of combat" in the situation above. All models in a unit fight together and unit A is no longer in "first round of combat" since it was fighting unit B in a previous turn.

No. If for some reason they should still be affected by frenzy, they regain it as soon as they rally.

No.

The unit may voluntarily declare "flee" as a charge reaction. It is the unit which declares the charge reaction (and not the character) and the immunity to psychology of the character does not transfer to the unit. Also, if they didn't choose to flee but were forced to, the character would be dragged along anyway.

No.